[UPDATE: After supposedly striking a deal to save the church building, gov’t seals off access and tears it down. Scroll to bottom for more photos and quotes.]
* * * * *
Here’s my soapbox: People need to update their understanding of Christian persecution in China. And a recent Chinese-officials-try-to-bulldoze-a-church incident that’s hit international news is a fine opportunity to illustrate what I’m on about here. Like it or not, the relationship between Chinese authorities and Chinese Christians is… not super-simple.
Does the Chinese gov’t persecute Christians?
First of all, it’s Chinese governments — plural — as in local, provincial, and national levels that are often at odds with one another, and never mind that levels of tolerance and policy implementation vary greatly from region to region. “The Chinese gov’t” is a complicated collection of departments that vary hierarchically and geographically, and each one has latitude re: its attitude and posture toward Christians within its territory. If some Chinese Christians are in trouble, we need to ask who’s giving it to them; “the Chinese gov’t” isn’t specific enough to be a useful answer. A given instance of Christians-in-trouble usually has little if anything to do with Beijing.
Second, this is a bad question, because if you’re talking about the whole country, the answer is:
- “Sometimes, but not usually.”
- “All the time, at least somewhere.”
- “Systematically marginalized? Yes. Actively persecuted? Not so much.”
Chinese authorities leave most Chinese Christians alone most of the time (within a status quo of effective, systematic social marginalization). So a more useful question is, “What factors are most likely to provoke trouble from the authorities?” There’s a list.
But let’s get to the sensational persecution story. This one’s actually kind of fun. Christians brazenly defy lower levels of gov’t while appealing to higher levels of gov’t. From The Telegraph:
Christians form human shield around church in ‘China’s Jerusalem’ after demolition threat
Christians have flocked to defend a church in eastern China after Communist Party officials claimed it was an “illegal construction” and announced plans to demolish it
…specifically, by painting “demolish” and “illegal construction” on the outside of the building. I suspect that got church-goers’ attention:
If you see these kinds of (sensationalized) headlines and (understandably) get the impression that Beijing is literally plowing churches into the ground across the country, look at the details in more than one report. In this case, one province let churches get out of hand, so they’re reducing the number of extra-high, extra-conspicuous steeples and have picked a couple buildings for demolition. Here’re some hand-picked excerpts:
the Sanjiang church is part of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement, China’s officially sanctioned and government-controlled Protestant church, making this week’s stand-off highly unusual.
A woman who introduced herself as a representative of the local government rejected claims the Communist Party was persecuting local Christians.
“They can believe. This is free. We can’t control them,” said the woman, who gave her name as Zhang Biyao.
Ms Zhang said the church had been illegally built and was structurally unsound. The government wanted to protect “people’s safety,” she claimed.
Sanjiang’s congregation was unconvinced.
Parishioners believe their church was targeted after Xia Baolong, the provincial Party chief, visited the region and was unimpressed by the prominence of a church built to house thousands of worshippers.
“His behaviour is illegal. He has abused his power. The construction of the church is not against the law,” said Wang Jianfeng, a 47-year-old man from a nearby congregation who was among hundreds of people gathered on the steps outside on Friday in a show of force.
Wen Xiaowu, another visitor, said he believed China’s president would be “displeased” with his Communist colleagues in Zhejiang.
“Xi Jinping has said society should be harmonious. He is very open-minded about disciples of the Christian church.”
— Local officials allow the government-controlled Three-Self Patriotic Church (or at least a legally-registered church; reports conflict) to build a big flashy church building.
— The provincial head comes into town and doesn’t like it. The unwritten rule is that Christianity must keep a low profile, and Christians in this province have been pushing that line for a while. In fact there’s a province-wide campaign to tone down the visibility of churches, mostly by making some (not all) churches take down extra-conspicuous steeples. See other articles here and here. This problem arose in the first place because churches across the province were given so much relative leeway that their buildings became too numerous and conspicuous for the comfort of provincial Party officials. In more tightly restricted provinces, churches aren’t allowed to become this conspicuous.
— So the local officials, who care first and foremost about their careers (which depend mostly on kissing up to their superiors) announce that the church building is illegal and, for the sake of “the People’s safety”, the “unsound” building must be destroyed, even though they’d previously designated the building a “model project”.
— So rank and file Christians publicly defy the local and provincial authorities, by  staging a sensational protest,  singling out the provincial Party head by name for blame,  appealing to higher levels of the Chinese gov’t (in this case the Chairman himself)  via domestic and international news media. (Using news media to apply pressure to the gov’t is common, though also dangerous.)
–> In other words, these Chinese Christians are appealing to the Chinese gov’t (President Xi Jinping) to protect their legal rights against persecutors from the Chinese gov’t (Zhejiang province Party head Xia Baolong and the local officials carrying out his orders).
If they get to keep their church building, will headlines read, “Chinese central authorities defend Christian church”? I suspect not.
Read the whole thing; while it may be short on solid info, it’s full of colourful anecdotes:
Sanjiang’s resistance has been organised with almost military precision. A makeshift kitchen behind the altar provides rice, pork and fried liver with leeks for those occupying the church while women hand out bottles of water and satsumas at the entrance.
By day, Christians from around the province crowd the church’s steps, with undercover security agents mingling among them, snapping photos and eavesdropping. By night, hundreds of worshippers take it in turns to keep watch, grabbing a few hours of sleep on cramped wooden pews between shifts.
Yang Zhumei, 74, said she had pleaded with officials to leave her church alone.
“I held their hands and said, “Comrades, don’t take down our cross. I can give you my head instead.”
The Christians have seen to it that the local and provincial authorities now have an embarrassing mess on their hands that will look much worse to their superiors than an overly-conspicuous church building would have. But even if the Christians win this round and keep their building, they’ll still be left with a ticked-off provincial Party head whose security forces know who every single one of those protestors is. For these Christians, things might not be easy until he retires or gets promoted.
It’s also worth comparing this to another recent local-government-hassles-legal-church-over-property incident.
(Images and quotes from this Telegraph article and @tomphillipsin.)
Near the root of this conflict are provincial and local gov’t concerns that Christianity in Wenzhou is growing out of control:
Provincial authorities deny they are waging an orchestrated campaign against Christian places of worship. However, Feng Zhili, the head of Zhejiangâ€™s ethnic and religious affairs committee, complained earlier this year that Christianityâ€™s spread had been â€œtoo excessive and too haphazardâ€.
See where this church sat along the highway:
And so they got the occupiers out and neutralized, sealed off access, and brought in the excavators:
After mounting their high-profile occupation in early April, many protesters withdrew from Sanjiang church after its leaders appeared to have negotiated a compromise with the government.
However, that deal appears to have broken down in recent days with reports that some church leaders and worshippers had been harassed and detained by security agents and officials.
â€œAll the roads are blocked, you can’t get close to the church,â€ said a local Protestant leader, who asked not to be named for fear of reprisals from the government.
Photographs sent to The Telegraph and posted on social media sites showed at least four excavators that appeared to be ripping down large sections of the churchâ€™s exterior.
Other images showed black police vans, military trucks and security agents standing on the main road outside.
Church members told The Telegraph authorities had attempted to silence the congregation and said they believed their communications were being monitored. â€œMy phone is not safe,â€ said one.
Asked to comment on Mondayâ€™s demolition, a propaganda official from Zhejiangâ€™s Communist Party Committee said, â€œI donâ€™t knowâ€ before the line went dead.
(Full article here.)
There are still appeals to Beijing, even from the head of China’s gov’t-controlled seminary:
In an unusual step, Chen Yilu, the head of the Nanjing Union Theological Seminary, spoke out against the provincial governmentâ€™s â€œcrude and hard-lineâ€ handling of the Sanjiang church crisis.
In a strongly-worded commentary that has been circulating online, Mr Chen said the incident would damage the Communist Partyâ€™s image as well as harming â€œsocial stabilityâ€. He called on Beijing to â€œintervene as soon as possible to avoid further deteriorationâ€.
But, as they say, “The mountains are high and the emperor is far away” ï¼ˆå±±é«˜çš‡å¸è¿œï¼‰.
More from this particular soapbox: