There’s an official campaign on in Zhejiang æµ™æ±Ÿ province, home of “China’s Jerusalem” (a.k.a. Wenzhou æ¸©å·ž, the epicenter of traditional Chinese Christianity), in which the government is either forcibly removing crosses from the tops of the church buildings or simply bulldozing them. One Catholic news site had documented 64 demolitions as of May 21. A Protestant human rights advocacy group puts the current total at around 360. And it continues with another one reported this week ï¼ˆTelegraph). Demolition crews come in at 3am, and churches are warned that if they don’t allow their cross to be removed then their whole building will be demolished just like that that huge, new, famous one. Church members are putting up resistance, though so far it’s been ultimately futile (see here for the first big clash that made international news, in which church grannies occupied their church building).
Why? If you answer, “Because they were in violation of building codes! We don’t tolerate that sort of thing in England and neither should the Chinese!” then YOU FAIL China 101 (and this panda facepalm is for you). If this campaign really was about public safety, building codes and zoning laws as the government claims, then they’d be flattening most of Zhejiang province, not zeroing in on churches (duh — I know I shouldn’t read the comments under news stories, but I still couldn’t believe how many times I saw this idea pop up). If you answer, “Because China’s run by atheistic anti-Christian Communists and it’s just like when Mao was alive!” then you’re slightly closer to the truth, but you’re still headed for summer school.
But the direction of your pet prejudices doesn’t matter because (as often happens) government documents have been leaked, showing us exactly why they’re going after churches. Ian Johnson, a 20-year veteran of Chinese state-religion reportage whom I’ve cited before for his reportage on the FLG, confirms in Church-State Clash in China Coalesces Around a Toppled Spire (NYT) what seasoned China people should have been able to figure out from the details in Tom Phillips’ earlier reporting (Telegraph). I’ll quote bits of Ian Johnson’s latest to fill in the three bullet points below, but you should read the whole thing; there’s lots of important detail I’m leaving out here.
First, what started all this?
The churchâ€™s problems seem to have begun with a visit to the region in October by the provincial party secretary, Xia Baolong, a close ally of President Xi. Visiting a new economic zone north of Wenzhou, Mr. Xia was reportedly disturbed that a religious building, especially one seen as representing a foreign belief, dominated the skyline. The next month, members of the congregation said, they were told to remove the cross atop their churchâ€™s steeple.
â€œXia Baolong came to inspect last autumn, and he saw the cross,â€ said an official in the Wenzhou governmentâ€™s religious hierarchy. â€œHe said: â€˜Take down the cross. Itâ€™s so high, and itâ€™s not appropriate.â€™ But the people said: â€˜Well, weâ€™ve already put it up there, and from a faith point of view, itâ€™s our faith, the cross. How can we take it down?â€™ â€
“Public safety & zoning violations”? Srsly, guys?
The government has defended its actions, saying the churches violated zoning restrictions. However, an internal government document reviewed by The New York Times makes it clear the demolitions are part of a strategy to reduce Christianityâ€™s public profile.
The nine-page provincial policy statement says the government aims to regulate â€œexcessive religious sitesâ€ and â€œoverly popularâ€ religious activities, but it specifies only one religion, Christianity, and one symbol, crosses.
â€œThe priority is to remove crosses at religious activity sites on both sides of expressways, national highways and provincial highways,â€ the document says. â€œOver time and in batches, bring down the crosses from the rooftops to the facade of the buildings.â€
Officials argued that the church violated zoning rules, but the provincial policy paper suggests that argument was a tactical cover. The paper, called â€œWorking Document Concerning the Realization of Handling of Illegal Religious Buildings,â€ said the policy would face international scrutiny so officials should be careful to cloak their effort under the guise of cracking down on building codes. â€œBe particular about tactics, be careful about methods,â€ it said, urging officials to focus on the idea of â€œillegal construction.â€ â€œThis is crucial to investigate and prosecute from the perspective of laws and regulations to avoid inviting heavy criticism.â€
â€œThey said, â€˜This will be your last church for 20 years, so make it big,â€™ â€ said a member of the Sanjiang congregation involved in the negotiations. â€œThey also told us that the development zone was a big project and needed a big church as a sign of how this was an outward-looking community.â€
An official in the cityâ€™s religious affairs bureau acknowledged that â€œofficials said it could be bigger, but perhaps this was a mistake.â€
Why single out Christianity?
Protestantism is also linked to a national debate about â€œuniversal values.â€ Some Chinese Protestants argue that rights such as freedom of expression are God-given, and thus cannot be taken away by the state. These beliefs have led many Protestants to take up human rights work. A disproportionate number of lawyers handling prominent political cases, for example, are Protestant.
The leveling of the Sanjiang Church came amid growing tensions not only between Christianity and the Communist government, but also between Christianity and other religions. It was preceded by a local petition accusing the church of destroying the areaâ€™s feng shui, geomantic principles that underlie traditional Chinese folk religion.
Increasingly, those other religions are receiving greater support from the Communist Party. In March, Mr. Xi praised Buddhism for its contributions to China.
Just a decade ago, the Communist Party condemned fortunetelling, feng shui and many traditional funerary rites as â€œfeudal superstition.â€ Now, these are protected under government programs to support â€œintangible cultural heritage.â€
ChinaSource sums it up in It’s About the Space:
…while space for Christianity and religious belief IS expanding in China, it is still the government that has the power to determine the limits of that space. And every once in awhile it needs to give a visible demonstration of that power.
The on-going church demolition and cross-removal campaign is about the growing ideological and physical space that Christianity is occupying in China; this campaign is “a shot across the bow” of Protestant Christianity.
The Chinese authorities don’t mind tolerating a Christianity that is effectively socially marginalized — i.e. it stays out of public consciousness. But Christians will expand into as much space as they’re allowed, and in the more tolerant cities and provinces like Qingdao in Shandong and (formerly) Zhejiang, that space continues to grow. Sometimes newly developing business districts like to accessorize with a fancy church building; it makes them feel open and cosmopolitan. This was the case with the Sanjiang church above, which the Zhejiang government made an example out of. It’s also what appears to be happening fifteen minutes from our neighbourhood in Qingdao, where an elaborate new church building with fancy stained glass and a river sits beside a big new park and a block away from a shiny shopping centre in a sea of construction.
But in Zhejiang province at least, the local Christian presence has exceeded the current limits of the government’s comfort zone. At the highest levels Christianity is perceived as a tool for foreign antagonists, partly because of Communist China’s ideological heritage, and partly because in China as elsewhere throughout history, the connection between human rights and Christianity is becoming increasingly clear — Christianity is disproportionately represented among China’s human rights agitators.
Also from the Ian Johnson and the NYT:
P.S. – Here’s two related things — an explanation of the Chinese words for “church”, and a translated bit from a Chinese pastor, calling for Chinese Christians to re-think their focus on church buildings in light of the recent conflict. (Chinese Christians — and local governments developing new districts — do tend to have a ‘thing’ for fancy church buildings.) At the very least, it’s an interesting anecdote for how Chinese Christians are processing this particular campaign:
When it comes to our faith, the word jiaohui (church, congregation, fellowship) is not the same as jiaotang (church building). It may be possible to deal violently with a jiaotang, but not with the jiaohui. Christians shouldn’t be so sad. Maybe this is a good time to reflect and wonder if we have put too much focus on church buildings. With this jiaotang now destroyed, we should focus our efforts on building the jiaohui.
The church (jiaohui) is not a church building (jiaotang). The original meaning of the term church (jiaohui) is “a people called by God gathered together.” The key terms are “called by God,” “people,” and “gather together.” It does not say that that “gathering together” must be done in a church building (jiaotang). Protestant theology has always emphasized that the key functions of the church (jiaohui) are “preaching the Word” and “properly administering the sacraments.” These two principles define what a true church (jiaohui) is. It says nothing about a building.
P.P.S. — For some further perspective on persecution, consider that at the same time Zhejiang province is bulldozing church buildings, this woman just gave birth in shackles on death row and will receive 100 lashes before she is hanged… because she’s not Muslim.